Who owns americas voting machines




















This facsimile machine was last used in the presidential election between Franklin D. Roosevelt and Thomas E. The American Voting Machine Company's sales literature carried this idealized picture of the poll-going electorate in In this New Yorker magazine cover from , election officials tally votes registered on the counters visible on the back of a gear-and-lever voting machine. These machines were last manufactured in and remain in statewide use in Louisiana and New York. They are being phased out under the Help America Vote Act of , which provides aid to states to acquire new voting equipment.

In the election of , half of the estimated 65 million ballots were cast on gear-and-lever voting machines.

This novelty handbill urges voters to pull the lever for Democratic presidential candidate John F. This sample ballot for presidential candidate Ronald Reagan was distributed to New York voters in The invention of a practical voting machine was the preoccupation of reformers in the late 19th century.

The operating features of these gear-and-lever machines followed contemporary trends in ballot design, notably the tabular layout of the blanket ballot and the private curtained booth. By the s, a market for such machines had developed in the nation's urban centers. State and local government officials justified investments in voting machines by noting the increasing length and complexity of ballots with multiple candidates and referenda, and the doubling of electorates with the enfranchisement of women.

Map of states and territories in which women vote The admission of western territories as new states advanced the right of women to vote.

Women practicing voting A group of women in Chicago practice casting votes in a municipal election by means of a voting machine in It's not clear who Trump is referring to when he talks about ownership by the "Radical Left". He is probably referring to claims circulating online that the company has links to the Clinton family and other Democratic politicians, including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

It is also important to clarify the difference between direct ownership of Dominion as claimed by Mr Trump, and donations made by the company either for philanthropic or lobbying purposes. Dominion has made donations to both Republican and Democratic interests, but it's not uncommon for a company such as this to lobby for government contracts in this way. Dominion Voting has released a statement saying it is a non-partisan US company and has no company ownership relationships with any member of the Pelosi family or the Clinton Global Initiative.

The Clinton Foundation has also issued a statement saying it "has never had any stake in Dominion Voting Systems; we have never been involved in the company's operations; and we can confirm that we are not currently working together". Dominion did however donate to the Clinton Foundation in , and made a philanthropic commitment to the foundation to donate election technology to poorer countries.

The rumours about Ms Pelosi stem from her former chief of staff, Nadeam Elshami, being hired by Dominion - but it has also hired staff previously associated with the Republican party.

The accusations of involvement with Dominion have also extended to members of President-elect Biden's transition team. Posts on social media claim Peter Neffenger, who is a volunteer for Mr Biden's team, is chairman of a subsidiary of Dominion, Smartmatic. Mr Neffenger is chairman of Smartmatic - but it's a competitor - not a subsidiary - of Dominion. Verdict: It's true that Texas did not provide certification for the machines.

Their approach is different to other states. The country is a mess, and we had this beautiful [Banamex] contract coming. But the Banamex deal fell through. Mugica found himself depressed and unable to get out of bed for days. Now standard in all new machines, it was novel at the time. Selling it required some presentations to Venezuelan government officials and academics. When Chavez won, the opposition cried foul and Smartmatic was branded as a tool of the late dictator, despite validation from the Carter Center and Organization of American States.

Smartmatic tried to ignore the uproar and expand into the U. In the presidential election, 17 states, as well as Washington D. The conservative firebrand dedicated multiple episodes of his show to labeling the company as a corrupt foreign entity that was trying to infiltrate the U. It was overwhelming and in the partners sold Sequoia and left the U.

There was plenty of growth outside the of the States. Over the last 14 years, Smartmatic has recorded and tabulated more than 5 billion votes globally.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000